The End of Ignorance: Multiplying our Human Potential

I've just finished reading The End of Ignorance: Multiplying our Human Potential, by John Mighton who has developed a mathematics education program called JUMP (Junior Unrecognized Mathematics Prodigies). His system has met with amazing success with a very wide range of elementary school students and considerable hostility from the Mathematics Education establishment in his native Ontario.

He challenges the NCTM orthodoxy, and the tenets of constructivist math education. I feared that this might be another "Mathematically Correct" screed, but it is far from that. Mighton has an enviable record of success in reaching the most "hopeless" students, and an admirable humility in recognizing that his system is not the only way to improve math education.

Mighton has a Ph.D. in mathematics, a career as a playwright, and a firm grasp of philosophy. He and a large cadre of volunteers have developed the program over a number of years, and refined it by trial-and-error. The major ideas are:

1. Learning takes place with a balance of concrete and symbolic, guided and independent, and procedural and conceptual.
2. Compared with constructivist methods, the teacher is expected to be a very active guide. Concepts are broken into small units, gaps in student understanding are detected and filled, lessons are carefully designed, sequential, and scaffolded. Weaker students are motivated by carefully graduated challenges, and stronger students are given extra challenges.
3. Whole-class lessons allow students to experience the thrill of discovery collectively.
4. Teachers give frequent and specific encouragement to all students.
5. Formative assessments are given continuously, and used to modify instruction. Students who don't know the material necessary to begin the lesson are given additional instruction before learning the new topic.
6. There is a strong emphasis of the development of  procedural knowledge through use of workbooks and individual work.

I think any educator who reads Mighton's calmly recollected stories of the hostility and closed-mindedness that his ideas have generated among certain math curriculum consultants (some of whom are subject to conflicts of interests due to their relationships with textbook publishers) is bound to feel a sense of embarrassment for our profession.

Mighton's book has caused me to rethink some of my pro-constructivist positions. I also will be following up on reading some of the work on cognitive psychology that he cites as having been seriously misinterpreted by the mathematics education establishment as supporting constructivist and situated learning approaches.